Tuesday, December 13, 2016

The Danger of Rogue Asteroids

This article details the concerns of a scientist regarding rogue asteroids that could cause a dinosaur-like extinction event on earth. He's rightfully concerned, we're woefully unprepared for such an event to the point that we may not even see it coming ahead of time. But it's a problem that we can solve, if we just put a little cash and effort into it. Seems like it would be money well spent to me.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/dec/13/space-asteroid-comet-nasa-rocket


Sunday, December 11, 2016

Japan takes on Space Junk

There have been a number of efforts lately to take on the growing problem of space junk. The more humans launch into space, the more junk gets created. Thankfully, the attempts at cleaning it up have become more proactive in recent years.

Read about Japan's Solutions at the BBC

Saturday, December 10, 2016

Transcript: Solipsism Syndrome and Space Psychology

On this channel I often talk about wide-ranging topics like space travel, perception and the nature of existence. While I always do it within the framework of science to the best of my abilities, rarely do these topics come together directly -- unless you happen to be floating in space with a leaking space suit pondering the meaning of existence until the air runs out.



But in one instance, they do come together directly. And, potentially, they do it in a very direct and concerning way. It's called Solipsism syndrome, and while no one's sure that the condition even exists, the fact that it possibly does has certain factions in the aerospace industry thinking about designing habitats and spacecraft that help alleviate it as a potential problem.

Solipsism syndrome is ultimately a psychological state. People subjected to extended periods of isolation, such as living in a space colony, may develop a sense that the world around them is not actually real. This would be a disassociative disorder that might make people become indifferent to the outside world, somehow mentally detached from it in a way that they simply can't shake until their isolation ends.

This could be an extremely dangerous situation that runs head long into science fiction territory. Numerous stories have been told, perhaps most famously with the movie "Event Horizon", of astronauts going mad in space. The scary thing is, there are several ways it could actually happen.

Imagine living on a Mars colony. You've been there for a year in total isolation other than your shipmates. If Solipsism syndrome is real, it may begin to not matter to you that the atmosphere outside is toxic. You may just decide to go for a stroll anyway without your helmet completely unconcerned about what's going to happen because you're convinced that none of it is real anyway. Add in the related phenomenon of cabin fever and ... well ... not good.

And it may even become a collective delusion. Mass hysteria is no joke, it's happened multiple times in history to bizarre effect including a 13th century convent of nuns that compulsively meowed like cats at specific times during the day. Another was the dancing plague of 1518 where a collective delusion developed in a town in France that led hundreds of people to dance without resting for weeks on end leading to several deaths. Likewise, a situation may develop where affected astronauts feed off each other's delusions to disastrous results.

And there's an even more dangerous aspect to this. Unlike other delusions, which are typically not valid and do not relate to anything rational, Solipsism syndrome does. Just as it is the case for the disorder's namesake, the philosophical school of thought known as solipsism, there is actually no way to prove that the real world does in fact exist.
It's fully within the realm of science and philosophy to ask that question, see my video "Is the Universe Real, or Is It a Computer Simulation?". But the bottom line is that all you can know is that you exist and everything else comes down to trusting your senses. Stop trusting them or convince yourself that solipsism reflects reality, and you're in trouble.

Add that with concerns about cloisterphobia resulting from being confined to a small habitat for long periods of time, physiological problems of living in a zero-gravity environment, and the fact that you're as far from a hospital as humans have ever been and its easy to see that the health concerns for deep space exploration become a significant issue indeed.

But there are ways to hopefully avoid these problems. One way is very good and frequent communications with people on earth ranging from family to psychologists. While psychologists have always been involved with ensuring the well-being of astronauts, they have in the past had trouble getting enough access to them due to the packed schedules of astronauts. Any long-term mission will need to address the psychological needs of astronauts more carefully than in the past. But there's also no guarantee that astronauts will talk to the psychologists making evaluation even more difficult.

Case in point, the great Skylab mutiny. Psychologically speaking, Skylab 4 got off to a bad start regardless of what happened after. The moment the astronauts opened the hatch, they were confronted with what appeared to be floating bodies. In fact, it was just a joke left by the Skylab 3 crew, they were just dummies in uniforms. But this mission would go on to see the astronauts actively hiding the effects of space adaptation syndrome, an illness that affects about half of all astronauts as they adjust to zero-G, from the doctors on the ground.

And then came the grueling schedule they had to endure. It was a case where the astronauts felt that they were overworked and ground control felt that they were not working hard enough. This led to something of a mutiny where the astronauts took an unauthorized day off. While the work schedule problem was resolved, and in fact the astronauts got more accomplished on the mission than what ground control had planned, it goes to show that psychology is an important factor to account for on space missions.


But none of that should scare us too much. If those hurdles can be overcome, which, no doubt, they can, the habitats and spacecraft themselves can be designed to be more psychologically friendly. As it stands, spacecraft and places like the ISS tend to be designed for utility rather than psychology. This will probably have to change, and with the advent of the superheavy lift rockets for Mars colonization that Elon Musk and others envision, we will be able to do things like have habitats that have gardens, exercise facilities, and wide open large spaces that will help significantly in keeping astronauts from losing it.

Friday, December 9, 2016

Could Pluto have a Subsurface Jelly Ocean?

It's almost like Pluto wants revenge for being demoted from the status of a planet. And it's doing that by basically turning out to be the most interesting object in the solar system. From emitting X-Rays to showing a young, geologically active surface Pluto has turned out to be nothing like what we envisioned before the New Horizon's probe passed by it in 2015. Now, another addition can be made to the long line of interesting discoveries made at Pluto: hints of a subsurface ocean.

Now, it's very early to speculate about what this ocean might be like and definitely a bit early for the 'does it harbor life' question. But this article is interesting because we can say that if the ocean exists it's probably because of a high ammonia content and may even be more of a gel than a liquid in consistency.

http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/solar-system/pluto-subsurface-ocean-possibly-support-primitive-life/

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

The commercial viability of space mining

It may just be that the first thing of value to commercially mine from the moon or asteroids will be water. This article details a company that is doing just that, setting their eyes on the water of the solar system.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/dec/06/space-mining-moon-asteroids-tech-companies

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Robotic Food Delivery Now a Reality

It's here. The robotic pizza delivery person. There are lots of advantages to such a technology; it will be cheaper than humans, faster, will make less errors and will be better at keeping food hot. Trouble is, it will also send those that deliver food for a living to the unemployment line. Technology is a double-edged sword indeed. Technological unemployment is a serious problem and will only broaden to other jobs and get worse as we advance and technology becomes more capable.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2304330/just-eat-makes-history-with-worlds-first-takeaway-delivered-by-robot/

Interestingly, the problem of technological unemployment has been known for a long time even though it's not really talked about in the mainstream media much. Here's a blast from the past, a strange paper authored by John Maynard Keynes in 1930 where he takes a rather rosey approach to the human race going unemployed at large.

http://www.econ.yale.edu/smith/econ116a/keynes1.pdf

He saw technological advancement as man solving his "economic problem". I'm no luddite or other such anti-technology type, but I can't help but think that the process of technological unemployment is going to to hurt. Big time. Pizzas only sell when there is an employed population that can afford them.